{
"additionalProperties": false,
"deprecated": true,
"description": "Ordered list of CommunicationEntries. This object is created by default along with the Domain. This type is deprecated. Use the type SecurityPolicy instead.",
"extends": {
"$ref": "PolicyConfigResource
},
"id": "CommunicationMap",
"module_id": "Policy",
"policy_hierarchical_children": [
"ChildCommunicationEntry"
],
"properties": {
"_create_time": {
"$ref": "EpochMsTimestamp,
"can_sort": true,
"description": "Timestamp of resource creation",
"readonly": true
},
"_create_user": {
"description": "ID of the user who created this resource",
"readonly": true,
"type": "string"
},
"_last_modified_time": {
"$ref": "EpochMsTimestamp,
"can_sort": true,
"description": "Timestamp of last modification",
"readonly": true
},
"_last_modified_user": {
"description": "ID of the user who last modified this resource",
"readonly": true,
"type": "string"
},
"_links": {
"description": "The server will populate this field when returing the resource. Ignored on PUT and POST.",
"items": {
"$ref": "ResourceLink
},
"readonly": true,
"title": "References related to this resource",
"type": "array"
},
"_protection": {
"description": "Protection status is one of the following: PROTECTED - the client who retrieved the entity is not allowed to modify it. NOT_PROTECTED - the client who retrieved the entity is allowed to modify it REQUIRE_OVERRIDE - the client who retrieved the entity is a super user and can modify it, but only when providing the request header X-Allow-Overwrite=true. UNKNOWN - the _protection field could not be determined for this entity.",
"readonly": true,
"title": "Indicates protection status of this resource",
"type": "string"
},
"_revision": {
"description": "The _revision property describes the current revision of the resource. To prevent clients from overwriting each other's changes, PUT operations must include the current _revision of the resource, which clients should obtain by issuing a GET operation. If the _revision provided in a PUT request is missing or stale, the operation will be rejected.",
"title": "Generation of this resource config",
"type": "int"
},
"_schema": {
"readonly": true,
"title": "Schema for this resource",
"type": "string"
},
"_self": {
"$ref": "SelfResourceLink,
"readonly": true,
"title": "Link to this resource"
},
"_system_owned": {
"description": "Indicates system owned resource",
"readonly": true,
"type": "boolean"
},
"category": {
"description": "- Distributed Firewall - Policy framework for Distributed Firewall provides four pre-defined categories for classifying a communication map. They are \"Emergency\", \"Infrastructure\", \"Environment\" and \"Application\". Amongst the layer 3 communication maps,there is a pre-determined order in which the policy framework manages the priority of these communication maps. Emergency category has the highest priority followed by Infrastructure, Environment and then Application rules. Administrator can choose to categorize a communication map into the above categories or can choose to leave it empty. If empty it will have the least precedence w.r.t the above four layer 3 categories.",
"required": false,
"title": "A way to classify a communication map, if needed.",
"type": "string"
},
"children": {
"description": "subtree for this type within policy tree containing nested elements.",
"items": {
"$ref": "ChildPolicyConfigResource
},
"required": false,
"title": "subtree for this type within policy tree",
"type": "array"
},
"communication_entries": {
"items": {
"$ref": "CommunicationEntry
},
"required": false,
"title": "CommunicationEntries that are a part of this CommunicationMap",
"type": "array"
},
"description": {
"can_sort": true,
"maxLength": 1024,
"title": "Description of this resource",
"type": "string"
},
"display_name": {
"can_sort": true,
"description": "Defaults to ID if not set",
"maxLength": 255,
"title": "Identifier to use when displaying entity in logs or GUI",
"type": "string"
},
"id": {
"can_sort": true,
"title": "Unique identifier of this resource",
"type": "string"
},
"marked_for_delete": {
"default": false,
"description": "Intent objects are not directly deleted from the system when a delete is invoked on them. They are marked for deletion and only when all the realized entities for that intent object gets deleted, the intent object is deleted. Objects that are marked for deletion are not returned in GET call. One can use the search API to get these objects.",
"readonly": true,
"required": false,
"title": "Indicates whether the intent object is marked for deletion",
"type": "boolean"
},
"overridden": {
"default": false,
"description": "Global intent objects cannot be modified by the user. However, certain global intent objects can be overridden locally by use of this property. In such cases, the overridden local values take precedence over the globally defined values for the properties.",
"readonly": true,
"required": false,
"title": "Indicates whether this object is the overridden intent object",
"type": "boolean"
},
"parent_path": {
"description": "Path of its parent",
"readonly": true,
"required": false,
"title": "Path of its parent",
"type": "string"
},
"path": {
"description": "Absolute path of this object",
"readonly": true,
"required": false,
"title": "Absolute path of this object",
"type": "string"
},
"precedence": {
"description": "This field is used to resolve conflicts between communication maps across domains. In order to change the precedence of a communication map one can fire a POST request on the communication map entity with a query parameter action=revise The precedence field will reflect the value of the computed precedence upon execution of the above mentioned POST request. For scenarios where the administrator is using a template to update several communication maps, the only way to set the precedence is to explicitly specify the precedence number for each communication map. If no precedence is specified in the payload, a value of 0 is assigned by default. If there are multiple communication maps with the same precedence then their order is not deterministic. If a specific order of communication map is desired, then one has to specify a unique precedence or use the POST request on the communication map entity with a query parameter action=revise to let the framework assign a precedence",
"title": "Precedence to resolve conflicts across Domains",
"type": "int"
},
"realization_id": {
"description": "This is a UUID generated by the system for realizing the entity object. In most cases this should be same as 'unique_id' of the entity. However, in some cases this can be different because of entities have migrated thier unique identifier to NSX Policy intent objects later in the timeline and did not use unique_id for realization. Realization id is helpful for users to debug data path to correlate the configuration with corresponding intent.",
"readonly": true,
"required": false,
"title": "A unique identifier assigned by the system for realizing intent",
"type": "string"
},
"relative_path": {
"description": "Path relative from its parent",
"readonly": true,
"required": false,
"title": "Relative path of this object",
"type": "string"
},
"resource_type": {
"description": "The type of this resource.",
"readonly": false,
"type": "string"
},
"tags": {
"items": {
"$ref": "Tag
},
"maxItems": 30,
"title": "Opaque identifiers meaningful to the API user",
"type": "array"
},
"unique_id": {
"description": "This is a UUID generated by the GM/LM to uniquely identify entites in a federated environment. For entities that are stretched across multiple sites, the same ID will be used on all the stretched sites.",
"readonly": true,
"required": false,
"title": "A unique identifier assigned by the system",
"type": "string"
}
},
"title": "Contains ordered list of CommunicationEntries",
"type": "object"
}